apache / apache/maka

OpenCode Go deepseek-v4.1-flash: no thinking-level selector (snapshot refresh job can't open its PR)

Open
#5,231 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
bug
Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
5.4k
Forks
502
Avg merge
1d 2h
Merged PRs (30d)
715

Description

### What happened

Using the built-in **OpenCode Go** connection with the model **`deepseek-v4.1-flash`** ("DeepSeek V4.1 Flash"), the composer shows **no thinking-level (reasoning effort) selector**, so effort can't be adjusted.

Expected: Maka derives the selector from model-catalog metadata, and upstream models.dev already declares reasoning options for this model — so the selector should appear with **low / high / max**.

Root cause: the bundled models.dev snapshot is stale and does not contain this model at all. Selecting the older id `deepseek-v4-flash` on the same connection *does* show the selector, which isolates this to the missing metadata entry for `deepseek-v4.1-flash`.

The weekly job that would refresh the snapshot exists (added in #4460) but its only run so far failed, so no refreshed snapshot has landed since 2026-09-01.

### How to reproduce

1. Settings → Models: select the built-in **OpenCode Go** connection.
2. Pick the model **DeepSeek V4.1 Flash** (`deepseek-v4.1-flash`).
3. Look at the composer's model row (a new chat, or the active session).

→ No thinking-level control appears.

4. Compare with the same connection, model **DeepSeek V4 Flash** (`deepseek-v4-flash`).

→ The low / high / max selector appears.

### Environment


- Maka version or commit: 0.2.0-dev.28.20260911 (nightly, `v0.2.0-dev.28.20260911`)
- OS and version: macOS
- Surface: Desktop
- Node.js version, if running from source: —

### Logs, screenshots, or additional context

Bundled snapshot (`scripts/model-metadata/models-dev-api.snapshot.json`) is the 2026-09-01 one:

- `origin.retrievedAt`: `2026-09-01T10:29:38.000Z`
- git blob: ``
- It has **no** `opencode-go/deepseek-v4.1-flash` entry. This same blob is what `main` carries today and what the 0.2.0-dev.28 build used.

Upstream already declares it — `anomalyco/models.dev`, `providers/opencode-go/models/deepseek-v4.1-flash.toml`:

```toml
base_model = "deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash"
name = "DeepSeek V4.1 Flash"

[[reasoning_options]]
type = "effort"
values = ["low", "high", "max"]
```

Local derivation confirms the miss:

```
lookupModelMetadata('opencode-go', 'deepseek-v4.1-flash') -> {} // no entry
thinkingVariantsForModel('opencode-go', 'deepseek-v4.1-flash') -> [] // selector hidden
thinkingVariantsForModel('opencode-go', 'deepseek-v4-flash') -> ["low","high","max"]
```

The scheduled refresh is failing, so the snapshot never advances:

- Workflow: `.github/workflows/model-metadata-upkeep.yml` ("Model metadata upkeep"), created 2026-09-01.
- Runs: exactly **one** — https://github.com/apache/maka/actions/runs/34093584258 — event `schedule`, started `2026-09-07T07:03:09Z`, conclusion **failure**.
- Failing step: **"Open the review pull request"**.
- Preceding steps all succeeded: "Report snapshot drift against models.dev", "Refresh the snapshot from models.dev", "Verify the regenerated outputs", "Detect a snapshot change". So the refresh produced a change, but the PR could not be opened — and the change was lost.

Impact: every model that upstream models.dev adds after 2026-09-01 is undescribed in released builds (no thinking levels, no metadata) until the updater can actually open/merge its PR.

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start with .github/workflows/model-metadata-upkeep.yml and inspect the failing "Open the review pull request" step, then review scripts/model-metadata/models-dev-api.snapshot.json and the preceding refresh and verification steps. Re-run the upkeep workflow or its relevant checks; done means the refreshed snapshot is retained and the workflow successfully opens its review pull request.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
github-actions, typescript
Domain
ci-cd, tooling
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
3/5
Estimated time
1-2 days
Activity status
Active
Clarity
Mostly clear
Newbie friendliness
68/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.