[Bug] In version 1.3.3 of IoTDB, The time series function TIME_DIFFERENCE returns an index out of bounds error.

### Search before asking

- [X] I searched in the [issues](https://github.com/apache/iotdb/issues) and found nothing similar.

### Version

version 1.3.3 (Build: ad95a7e)

### Describe the bug and provide the minimal reproduce step

```
DROP DATABASE root.db0.t1
CREATE DATABASE root.db0.t1

CREATE TIMESERIES root.db0.t1.c0 WITH datatype=INT32;
INSERT INTO root.db0.t1(timestamp, c0) VALUES (1641024000000, 0), (1641024005000, 1);

# query 1
SELECT TIME_DIFFERENCE(c0) FROM root.db0.t1 WHERE c0 < 0;

# query 2
SELECT TIME_DIFFERENCE(c0) FROM root.db0.t1 WHERE time != time;
```

### What did you expect to see?

The expected result set for Query 1 is: **empty set**

The expected result set for Query 2 is: **empty set**

### What did you see instead?

The actual result set returned by Query 1 is: **empty set**

The actual result set returned by Query 2 is: **Msg: org.apache.iotdb.jdbc.IoTDBSQLException: 301: Index 1 out of bounds for length 1**

### Anything else?

Dear IoTDB team, In the above queries, both Query 1 and Query 2 are unable to retrieve any data, so they both perform the `TIME_DIFFERENCE` operation on empty sets. However, Query 2 triggers an index out of bounds error during execution. This should be considered a crash error.

### Are you willing to submit a PR?

- [ ] I'm willing to submit a PR!

Start by running the minimal reproduction against IoTDB 1.3.3, comparing Query 1 and Query 2. Trace the TIME_DIFFERENCE execution path for the empty result produced by Query 2; done means both queries return an empty set without an index-out-of-bounds exception. No source file or existing test is named in the issue.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.