Revisit metadata table compaction planning
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 6.2k
- Forks
- 2.5k
- Avg merge
- 2d 8h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 111
Description
We need to revisit whether the planner needs to write an instant in the past or if we can plan using the regular patterns we have.
## JIRA info
- Link: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-9477
- Type: Improvement
- Epic: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HUDI-9384
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
No files or tests are named. Start by reviewing the metadata-table compaction planner and the linked JIRA issues HUDI-9477 and HUDI-9384, then determine whether planning an instant in the past is necessary or whether regular patterns suffice. Done means the planning approach and required implementation scope are documented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- data-engineering
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Active
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100