[Task]: Problem with transaction pipeline
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 1.5k
- Forks
- 476
- Avg merge
- 18h 32m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 216
Description
### What needs to happen?

Hi,
In the example on the screenshot, the insertion into the database is performed one insert per row.
INSERT INTO "BI2_ACCRUAL_CUBE_6860" ("ITEM_ID", "ETOF_ID", "ISD_ID", "CARRIER_ID", ... "COST_USD")
VALUES ( '111111111111'::Integer, '111111111111'::Integer, '111111111111'::Integer, .... '1.11111111111111111111')
...........
INSERT INTO "BI2_ACCRUAL_CUBE_6860" ("ITEM_ID", "ETOF_ID", "ISD_ID", "CARRIER_ID", ... "COST_USD")
VALUES ( '2222222222222'::Integer, '2222222222222'::Integer, '2222222222222222'::Integer, .... '2.222222222222222')
and so on 35 thousand times in our example.
The transaction pipeline ignores batch insertion. And this is correct, since there should be one commit at the end.
But for the Vertika DB, inserting each row as a separate insert leads to the creation of a huge number of files and an error: "to many ROS containers". What makes it impossible to use transaction pipeline with Vertica DB.
Can you suggest any solution that will allow transaction pipelines to work normally with the Vertica database?
### Issue Priority
Priority: 3
### Issue Component
Component: Database, Component: Pipelines
Contributor guide
Research direction
No file or test is named in the issue. Start by reproducing the 35,000-row transaction pipeline against Vertica and trace how database inserts are generated; done means a transaction pipeline can work with Vertica without creating too many ROS containers while retaining the final commit.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java
- Domain
- backend, database
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100