problematic dagworks branding and authors details
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 2.6k
- Forks
- 213
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
https://github.com/search?q=repo%3Aapache%2Fhamilton+title%3A+DAGWorks&type=code
Many of the matches here are problematic.
To highlight a few that you can search for in this repo yourselves
* const organizationName = "dagworks-inc";
* Why use the DAGWorks platform?
* Co-creator of Hamilton -- with ASF projects/podlings, there is community ownership and referring to anyone as creator or founder is frowned on - if I search hard enough, I suspect I'll fan a rule against it
* Remove authors details everywhere - community ownership, you can link to GitHub stats on your project to highlight the main contributors (just a link - let people follow the link to research for themselves)
* https://hub.dagworks.io/docs/#checklist-for-new-dataflows in contribute.py - should have an Apache Hamilton hosted link and Apache Hamilton branding
* Generally, too many mentions of Hamilton and not enough of Apache Hamilton
* The whole contrib release is problematic - these modules should be given names and no longer have author names or org names as the names of the directories or in authors files
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the repository search linked in the issue and inspect the highlighted branding, author, and organization-name matches, including contribute.py and the contrib release modules. Catalog the affected files before changing them; done means the problematic DAGWorks branding, author details, and external checklist link are addressed consistently in the repository.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- content, documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100