[Improvement] Inconsistencies Between Python and Java APIs

### What would you like to be improved?

While working on issue #6577, I noticed (thanks to @yuqi1129, PR #6581) that there are some inconsistencies between APIs written on Python and Java. I think that this inconsistency can lead to confusion and errors.

I would like to suggest to adjust the signature functions written on Python. Here is an approximate list of incosisntecy that I found:
- On the gravitino client you can see the `create_catalog` method:
https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/873c6afeb3b0a5ebdb6d64b1d279442ac5e3115c/clients/client-python/gravitino/client/gravitino_client.py#L77-L87
https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/873c6afeb3b0a5ebdb6d64b1d279442ac5e3115c/clients/client-java/src/main/java/org/apache/gravitino/client/GravitinoClient.java#L118-L127
Or the same with `load_catalog`:
https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/873c6afeb3b0a5ebdb6d64b1d279442ac5e3115c/clients/client-python/gravitino/client/gravitino_client.py#L74-L75
https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/873c6afeb3b0a5ebdb6d64b1d279442ac5e3115c/clients/client-java/src/main/java/org/apache/gravitino/client/GravitinoClient.java#L113-L116
- On metalake you can see the same problem:
https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/873c6afeb3b0a5ebdb6d64b1d279442ac5e3115c/clients/client-python/gravitino/client/gravitino_metalake.py#L118-L125
https://github.com/apache/gravitino/blob/873c6afeb3b0a5ebdb6d64b1d279442ac5e3115c/clients/client-java/src/main/java/org/apache/gravitino/client/GravitinoMetalake.java#L215-L222

I'm a new contributor to this repository (I only made a one-line commit), so if you have any suggestions, I'm ready to hear them!

### How should we improve?

I suggest adapting the function signatures in the Python client to match those in the Java client. I think this will improve consistency and reduce potential bugs (for example, issue #6577 is born out of this inconsistency).

I would like to take up this issue and work on resolving it.