Grails' <asset:script> in a GSP page not treated the same as plain <script>

Plain \:
_⚠️ attachment `image.png` was not included in the export_

Note the green background on the :
_⚠️ attachment `image1.png` was not included in the export_

It is hard to identify HOW the 2 differ (apart from the irksome green background). Here's one way...
Layout behaves differently. Start from:
_⚠️ attachment `image2.png` was not included in the export_

Select the function and press CTRL-ALT-L to perform a relayout:
_⚠️ attachment `image3.png` was not included in the export_

Start from:
_⚠️ attachment `image4.png` was not included in the export_

Select the function and press CTRL-ALT-L to perform a relayout:
_⚠️ attachment `image5.png` was not included in the export_

NO change :-(

Relevant(?) settings:

_⚠️ attachment `image6.png` was not included in the export_{width=70%}
_⚠️ attachment `image7.png` was not included in the export_{width=70%}

I can't see a way to get IntelliJ to inject the 'javascript' langauge into the body of the \

Start by reproducing the formatting difference in IntelliJ IDEA using a GSP page with plain and <asset:script> tags, then inspect the plugin's handling of language injection and reformatting. Done means both forms format consistently without removing the asset: prefix, with JavaScript recognized inside the custom tag.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.