[Question] Does Apache Fory support field validation inside *.fdl?

### Question

**Hi.**

**Does Apache Fory support field validation inside \*.fdl , similar to Protobuf tools (Protovalidate (CEL)/protoc-gen-validate (PGV))** ❓

~https://fory.apache.org/docs/compiler/protobuf_idl_support/~

```proto
syntax = "proto3";

package v1.user;

import "buf/validate/validate.proto";

message UserProfile {
string id = 1 [(buf.validate.field).string.uuid = true];

// Numeric boundaries
uint32 age = 2 [(buf.validate.field).uint32.gte = 18, (buf.validate.field).uint32.lte = 120];

string email = 3 [(buf.validate.field).string.email = true];

// Length constraints and regex pattern matching
string username = 4 [
(buf.validate.field).string.min_len = 3,
(buf.validate.field).string.max_len = 30,
(buf.validate.field).string.pattern = "^[a-zA-Z0-9_]+$"
];

// Collection constraint (ensure list contains at least one item)
repeated string roles = 5 [(buf.validate.field).repeated.min_items = 1];

// Standard rules handle simple single-field checks.
uint64 amount = 6 [(buf.validate.field).uint64.gt = 0];
uint64 balance = 7;

// CEL produces a dynamic error message with runtime values.
option (buf.validate.message).cel = {
id: "transfer.sufficient_balance"
expression:
"this.amount <= this.balance ? ''"
": 'cannot transfer ' + string(this.amount)"
" + ' with a balance of ' + string(this.balance)"
};
}

```

Start by reading the linked protobuf IDL support documentation and comparing it with the FDL question and validation examples. Confirm whether field and message validation are supported, then document the supported scope or limitations in the issue or relevant documentation.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.