Fluss x Iceberg: Table maintenance operations
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 58
- Forks
- 50
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
### Search before asking
- [x] I searched in the [issues](https://github.com/apache/fluss-rust/issues) and found nothing similar.
### Motivation
Roadmap 2026 Fluss x Iceberg :
**Pillar 6: Maintenance Operations**
Lifecycle management for Iceberg metadata and files.
- Snapshot Expiration: Configurable (default: disabled)
- Orphan File Deletion: Configurable (default: disabled)
To achieve this goal with efficiency and with good performance. We can brainstorm/discuss to have fluss-rust + iceberg-rust integration - As per some of the benchmark rust implementation have better performance for all iceberg table maintenance operations .
### Solution
_No response_
### Anything else?
Ref https://github.com/apache/fluss/discussions/2342#discussioncomment-15520502
Also medium blog compaction with datafusion + rust : https://medium.com/@amitgil87/building-a-distributed-compaction-engine-for-apache-iceberg-with-rust-datafusion-09faa63c1438
Some old discussion to refer : https://github.com/apache/iceberg-rust/issues/624
### Willingness to contribute
- [x] I'm willing to submit a PR!
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.