apache / apache/datafusion

Follow up improvement for reverse parquet when row group size is huge, so it may cause OOM.

Open
#19,048 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
enhancement
Dominant language
Rust
Stars
9.3k
Forks
2.4k
Avg merge
3d 7h
Merged PRs (30d)
344

Description

### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?

Details:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/18817#discussion_r2576073230

### Describe the solution you'd like

_No response_

### Describe alternatives you've considered

_No response_

### Additional context

_No response_

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start by reading the discussion linked from the issue, including the referenced DataFusion pull request, to understand the reverse-Parquet improvement and the huge-row-group OOM scenario. Locate the implementation and tests identified there, reproduce or characterize the memory problem, and confirm that the follow-up handles large row groups without OOM.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
rust
Domain
data-engineering
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
35/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.