Follow up improvement for reverse parquet when row group size is huge, so it may cause OOM.
Open
enhancement
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 9.3k
- Forks
- 2.4k
- Avg merge
- 3d 7h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 344
Description
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
Details:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/pull/18817#discussion_r2576073230
### Describe the solution you'd like
_No response_
### Describe alternatives you've considered
_No response_
### Additional context
_No response_
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by reading the discussion linked from the issue, including the referenced DataFusion pull request, to understand the reverse-Parquet improvement and the huge-row-group OOM scenario. Locate the implementation and tests identified there, reproduce or characterize the memory problem, and confirm that the follow-up handles large row groups without OOM.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rust
- Domain
- data-engineering
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100