Consider using `eps1lon/actions-label-merge-conflict` GitHub action to check merge conflicts
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 9.3k
- Forks
- 2.4k
- Avg merge
- 3d 7h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 344
Description
### Is your feature request related to a problem or challenge?
We have a TODO item in our labeler workflow:
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/58bc7496bfdde37c6c1860634e0ef1d8b9b98921/.github/workflows/labeler.yml#L55-L65
I think we can use this action if we pin it to a specific hash, e.g.
https://github.com/apache/datafusion/blob/1629420162815e1a725b9be5344fafd1fbe2e5ff/.github/workflows/rust.yml#L755
### Describe the solution you'd like
Consider enabling this
### Describe alternatives you've considered
If we don't see value in having this action then remove the commented code
### Additional context
_No response_
Contributor guide
Research direction
Inspect .github/workflows/labeler.yml around lines 55-65 and the pinned-action example in .github/workflows/rust.yml around line 755. Determine whether to enable eps1lon/actions-label-merge-conflict at a specific hash or remove the commented TODO code; the workflow should clearly reflect the chosen direction.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github-actions
- Domain
- ci-cd
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 52/100