Compatibility matrix: Should the content be improved ?

There was a discussion [upstream](https://camel.zulipchat.com/#narrow/stream/257302-camel-quarkus/topic/camel-quarkus.202.2E14.2Ex.20and.20camel.203.2E18.2E2) with possible improvement to the compatibility matrix.

Should the matrix point to branch, like
`2.13.x | 3.18.x | 2.13.x | 22.3.x |   | 2.13.x ...` instead of
`2.13.x | 3.18.3 | 2.13.5.Final | 22.3.0 |   | 2.13.x`

Also some versions looks wrong. camel-quarkus `2.15.x` is said to be compatible with camel `3.18.2`.
Should it be declared to be compatible with camel `3.19.x` instead ?

Locate the compatibility matrix in the camel-quarkus repository and read the upstream Zulip discussion linked in the issue. Compare the matrix's current Camel Quarkus, Camel, and Quarkus version entries with the proposed branch-based format and the 2.15.x compatibility example; done means the intended changes and corrected versions are agreed and documented.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.