请问DBD中如果两个wrapper list会不会性能更好
Open
discussion
- Dominant language
- C++
- Stars
- 17.6k
- Forks
- 4.1k
- Avg merge
- 2d 12h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 69
Description
现在DBD里只有一个wrapper list,modify后台修改完了需要拿锁等待所有读锁释放;如果wrapper list也分前后台两组是不是这里会更快一点?
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by locating the DBD implementation and the code paths for the single wrapper list, modify, and read-lock handling. Investigate whether separating foreground and background wrapper lists is feasible and measure the effect on lock waiting; done requires a documented decision supported by performance evidence.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- cpp
- Domain
- backend, performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100