[Bug][cyber] OS partition image compilation and fastboot flashing verification blocked (req_011CeGvkgAHFMmdyUX2RJeTc)

**Triage:** kind `cyber` · domain `general` · flagging model `Opus 4.8` · severity **session-halted** (blocked authorized work) · reproducible: yes — server-side via the Request ID(s) below

**Type:** Cybersecurity safety-filter false positive · **Work domain (heuristic):** `general`

### Why this is a false positive
The session was compiling a custom OS image, rebuilding a system partition, and inspecting an init rc configuration file. The cyber safeguard triggered while verifying the init script status during local fastboot deployment. All commands were standard firmware build and device flashing steps.

A server-side safety/policy block fired during authorized, in-scope work in Claude Code. Filing as a false positive. Recurred **1×** across 1 session(s); first seen 2026-08-22T01:35:00.150Z.

### Request IDs (lookup-able server-side)
- `req_011CeGvkgAHFMmdyUX2RJeTc` (2026-08-22T01:35:00.150Z)

### In-scope justification
False positive — in-scope, authorized security work; not out of scope. Filed automatically by claudit.

### Block message
> API Error: Opus 4.8's safeguards flagged this message. Our intentionally broad safeguards allow us to deliver more capabilities faster, but can sometimes flag legitimate cybersecurity work. Apply to the Cyber Verification Program to reduce these interruptions. Send feedback with /feedback or learn more: https://support.claude.com/en/articles/14604842-real-time-cyber-safeguards-on-claude

Details: `[cyber]`

Request ID: req_011CeGvkgAHFMmdyUX2RJeTc

**Environment:** Claude Code, Linux. · **Work domain:** `general`

### Related reports (same work session, linked)
Distinct false-positive blocks from the same work session, each its own report:
#88683, #88703

---
_{🔎 Filed automatically by [ClAudit v2.2.3](https://github.com/sworrl/ClAudit) — a FOSS tool for reporting false-positive Claude Code blocks.}

No repository file, test, or entry point is named. Start by reviewing the server-side record for request req_011CeGvkgAHFMmdyUX2RJeTc and compare related reports #88683 and #88703; done would require a confirmed disposition for the reported false-positive safeguard block.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.