ant-design / ant-design/pro-components
👑 [需求]能否用 es-toolkit 替换 lodash-es
- Dominant language
- TypeScript
- Stars
- 4.8k
- Forks
- 1.4k
- Avg merge
- 10h 44m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
提问前先看看:
https://github.com/ryanhanwu/How-To-Ask-Questions-The-Smart-Way/blob/main/README-zh_CN.md
### 🔩 所属模块或组件
全局
### 🥰 需求描述
在今天lodash 已经明显显得笨重了,哪怕是是lodash-es,也依然很大, 社区已经有了优秀的继任者 es-toolkit,体积比lodash 小97%,速度是lodash的两到三倍,能否用 es-toolkit替换lodash,如果可以,我可以来替换。
https://github.com/toss/es-toolkit
### 🚑 其他信息
我看到pro-components 使用了lodash-es 又做了转换转成lodash ,我不理解这样做的原因,可以解释一下吗
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start by auditing the project-wide lodash-es usage and the conversion to lodash in pro-components, then compare the required APIs with es-toolkit. Define the migration scope and compatibility requirements before changing dependencies; done means the replacement works across the affected components without regressions.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- typescript
- Domain
- frontend, tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100