👑 [需求] LightFilter 下使用 ProFormDependency 样式不一致

### 🔩 所属模块或组件

率属组件：LightFilter

### 🥰 需求描述

LightFilter 下使用 ProFormDependency 样式不一致，希望 ProFormDependency下的ProFormFields按照LightFilter的样式正常展示

### ⛰ 功能需求适用场景

查询时联动修改下拉框数据

### 🧐 解决方案

应用样式时不要仅仅在 LightFilter 下的一级DOM层应用

### 🚑 其他信息

`import {
LightFilter,
ProFormDependency,
ProFormSelect,
ProFormText,
ProFormTreeSelect,
ProTable,
} from '@ant-design/pro-components';

function Rule() {
const treeData = [
{
title: 'Node1',
value: '0-0',
key: '0-0',
children: [
{
title: 'Child Node1',
value: '0-0-0',
key: '0-0-0',
},
],
},
{
title: 'Node2',
value: '0-1',
key: '0-1',
children: [
{
title: 'Child Node3',
value: '0-1-0',
key: '0-1-0',
},
{
title: 'Child Node4',
value: '0-1-1',
key: '0-1-1',
},
{
title: 'Child Node5',
value: '0-1-2',
key: '0-1-2',
},
],
},
];
return (

export default Rule;`

至于searchFormRender 使用 LightFilter是因为在自带的ProTable search.filterType = 'light'时有不少问题官方无法及时修复 例如dateRange 出现Invalid Date treeSelect选中后展示的value 等

Reproduce the example with LightFilter, ProFormDependency, and the ProForm fields shown in the issue, then inspect how LightFilter applies styles to nested fields. Confirm the behavior with the provided ProTable searchFormRender example; done means ProFormDependency fields use the same LightFilter styling as directly nested fields.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.