Refactoring of the launcher
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 497
- Forks
- 77
- Avg merge
- 22h 37m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 45
Description
> Similar to the earlier conversations on this method (see below), this continues a pattern I've flagged before: accumulation of low-level, untested branching logic. I understand this follows the existing style of the method, but each addition makes the eventual refactor larger and the method harder to review as a whole.
>
> I'd like to see argument-validation branches like this (and the timeout-string construction from before) extracted into small, testable methods rather than added inline. Given this has come up multiple times now, including in internal meetings, please treat this as a standing convention going forward, not a case-by-case judgment call.
>
>
>
> Final changes to the same method in same PR:
>
>
_Originally posted by @seanpearsonuk in [#4990](https://github.com/ansys/pyfluent/pull/4990/changes#r3550231986)_
Contributor guide
Research direction
The payload does not name a file, test, or launcher entry point. Start by locating the launcher method and reviewing the related changes in PR #4990, then identify the argument-validation branches and timeout-string construction mentioned here. Done means those pieces are separated into small, testable methods without changing the launcher's behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- cli
- Issue type
- Refactor
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 30/100