Better Typing for `forwardRef` and `resolveForwardRef`

We have a fix but wanted to make sure a pull request for `forwardRef` would be accepted. It's marked as`@experimental`, are there any plans to change it?

**I'm submitting a ...** (check one with "x")

```
[x] bug report => search github for a similar issue or PR before submitting
[ ] feature request
[ ] support request => Please do not submit support request here, instead see https://github.com/angular/angular/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#question
```

**Current behavior**
When using `forwardRef` and `resolveForwardRef`, types will not be tracked.

```
class MyType {}
let myForwardRef = forwardRef(() => MyType);
resolveForwardRef(myForwardRef) //=> any
```

**Expected behavior**

```
class MyType {}
let myForwardRef = forwardRef(() => MyType);
resolveForwardRef(myForwardRef) //=> MyType
```

**Reproduction of the problem**
Just import `forwardRef` and `resolveForwardRef` and observe the types in a supporting editor

**What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?**
To keep code type-safe and tooling effective

**Please tell us about your environment:**
MacOS Sierra 10.12, VSCode
- **Angular version:** 2.0.0-rc.7
- **Browser:** N/A
- **Language:** TypeScript 2.0.2
- **Node (for AoT issues):** N/A

Start by importing `forwardRef` and `resolveForwardRef` in a TypeScript 2.0.2 project and observing their inferred types in a supporting editor. Done means the `forwardRef` example resolves to `MyType` rather than `any`, while preserving type safety.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.