False positives?
Open
- Dominant language
- JavaScript
- Stars
- 287
- Forks
- 95
- Avg merge
- 13h 23m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 13
Description
Have a look at https://github.com/citizensadvice/fluentd-docker/security/code-scanning/30, the [CVE](https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2022-48174) is about busybox < 1.35 , and busybox is on 1.35.0-r29 (and so is ssl_client) ... interestingly when running grype on an image built in the same way locally, I don't get this issue.
Contributor guide
Research direction
Start with the linked GitHub code-scanning alert and CVE-2022-48174, then compare the reported BusyBox and ssl_client versions with the locally built image scanned by Grype. Done means determining whether the alert is a false positive and documenting the evidence or the required correction.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- docker, github-actions
- Domain
- devops, security
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 3/5
- Estimated time
- 1-2 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 28/100