ampproject / ampproject/meta-ac
Privacy
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 24
- Forks
- 13
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
User and Data Privacy design need more discussion and broad industry input; at the same time there are tactical components of the Privacy focus we can address.
**Potential Topic Areas:**
* Make privacy features easier to enable in AMP
* Thinking of amp-consent scalability as more countries expand privacy laws
* Review how amp-consent can be adapted ‘on the edge’ to accomodate for geo-specific consent requirements.
* Perhaps a component which wraps AMP consent with AMP geo, without headaches?
* Can AMP become the de-facto mechanism for ‘getting privacy right’?
* More concrete actions
* Lack of flexibility of AMP in the privacy realm
* How to improve these issues?
* Privacy by design vs. reactive approach
* Are we missing a ‘privacy by design’ concept, where individual components / scenarios can declare their privacy/consent/storage scenarios (e.g., “Don’t render this component for users without X consent”).
* Build privacy into AMP design features
* What types and examples of ‘consent’ and privacy models (and resultant business/site logic) exist, and where does AMP struggle to solve for those? Can we get/create/define a bunch of these scenarios, and assess our fit?
* Related issues from 2020:
* #121 - Blog post on the CCPA outcome
* #122 - Privacy Policy on AMP Caches
* #123 - Privacy Messaging
* #142 - LGPD: Brazil's GDPR
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.