allure-framework / allure-framework/allure-python
[Feature] Pytest - Rename @allure.testcase decorator to @allure.tms
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 814
- Forks
- 260
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
[//]: # (
. Note: for support questions, please use Stackoverflow or Gitter**.
. This repository's issues are reserved for feature requests and bug reports.
.
. In case of any problems with Allure Jenkins plugin** please use the following repository
. to create an issue: https://github.com/jenkinsci/allure-plugin/issues
.
. Make sure you have a clear name for your issue. The name should start with a capital
. letter and no dot is required in the end of the sentence. An example of good issue names:
.
. - The report is broken in IE11
. - Add an ability to disable default plugins
. - Support emoji in test descriptions
)
#### I'm submitting a ...
- [ ] bug report
- [x] feature request
- [ ] support request => Please do not submit support request here, see note at the top of this template.
#### What is the current behavior?
The different Allure API implementations use different names for the testcase link:
- Python behave: `@allure.tms:TMS-456`
- Python pytest: `@allure.testcase("TMS-456")`
- Java JUnit: `@TmsLink("TMS-456")`
- .Net NUnit: `[AllureTms("TMS-456")]`
- Cucumber.js: `this.tms("https://example.com/tms/TMS-456", "TMS-456");`
- PHPUnit: `#[TmsLink('TMS-456')]`
#### What is the expected behavior?
For the sake of coherence, could we rename the `@allure.testcase` decorator to `@allure.tms` for pytest ?
#### What is the motivation / use case for changing the behavior?
To have a coherent API
#### Please tell us about your environment:
- Allure version: 2.25.0
- Test framework: pytest@7.4.2
- Allure adaptor: allure-pytest@2.13.2
#### Other information
[//]: # (
. e.g. detailed explanation, stacktraces, related issues, suggestions
. how to fix, links for us to have more context, eg. Stackoverflow, Gitter etc
)
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.