alibaba / alibaba/x-deeplearning
AUC bug report
- Dominant language
- PureBasic
- Stars
- 4.3k
- Forks
- 1k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
In ESMM, it seems there is a bug in auc computation. When there is no positive example in a batch, this batch is ignored for the auc computation. We cannot just simply remove this batch from computation, which is different from the auc caculation in tensorflow.
In my opinion, auc should be computed globally, insteady of averaging locally like in x-deeplearning. The all-negative batch can still change the number of FP globally, which cannot be ignored.
This bug makes the performance of esmm pretty high.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
Research direction
Start by locating the ESMM AUC computation and its batch-level aggregation. Compare its handling of all-negative batches with TensorFlow's global AUC behavior, then add or update coverage for batches that contain no positive examples. Done means the metric incorporates false positives from those batches rather than ignoring them.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- tensorflow
- Domain
- machine-learning
- Issue type
- Bug
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 35/100