后续会不会添加 LOCAL, BOTH 当更新redis里面的缓存的时候,同时更新LOCAL
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Java
- Stars
- 5.6k
- Forks
- 1.1k
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Suppose I have two applications running:
-
When I specify cachetype = local, only the cache of the specified machine is updated, and the other machine is not updated.
-
When I specified cachetype = both, only the cache of the specified machine was updated, and the other machine was not updated.
Will you consider adding a new feture? When updating the cache, whether local, both or cache can be updated at the same time
thanks.
假设我应用程序运行两台:
1、当我指定CacheType=LOCAL的时候,只是当时指定的机器cache更新了,另外一台没有更新。
2、当我指定CacheType=BOTH的时候,只是当时指定的机器cache更新了,另外一台没有更新。
后续会考虑添加一个新的feture,当更新缓存的时候不管是LOCAL, BOTH,cache 都能同时更新
感谢。
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by tracing how CacheType=LOCAL and CacheType=BOTH handle updates across the local cache and Redis in a two-application deployment. Clarify the intended cross-instance invalidation or update semantics, then identify how completion would be tested for both applications receiving the same cache change.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- java, redis
- Domain
- backend, distributed-systems
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100