alibaba / alibaba/Sentinel

常用的“关联”流控有BUG吗?还是我根本没有用对?

Open
#2,407 10 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
kind/question
Dominant language
Java
Stars
23.1k
Forks
8.1k
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

1632811880019_E0754E7E-CA3E-424f-B967-5411C1A9A729
1632811883060_740AC4C8-14D3-4a5f-A14E-B32D25D97213

(1)test4_2流控成功,,但test4_1依然没有启用限流
(2)但是当我把test4_2的阈值类型改成并发线程数后,,,test4_1就可以限流,
(3)这典型就是BUG,也就是QPS和并发线程这两个策略不兼容

使用sentinel-dashboard-1.8.2.jar版本

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start by reproducing the reported behavior with sentinel-dashboard-1.8.2.jar, using the test4_1 and test4_2 flow-control configuration shown in the screenshots. Compare QPS and concurrent-thread threshold types; done means determining whether the interaction is a bug or a configuration issue and documenting or correcting the observed behavior.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
java
Domain
backend
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.