akasper / akasper/plate

[Epic]: Q&A-Driven Planning Workflows & Endless Feed Surfaces (v1.0.0)

Open
#656 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

area:agent area:product Epic need:refinement risk:medium status:implemented status:stub
Dominant language
Python
Stars
1
Forks
0
Avg merge
8m
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Description

Thematic sub-Epic under v1.0.0 Roadmap #654.

Covers the core end-user experience of endless Q&A-driven planning and the surfacing of Questions/Tasks/approvals.

Scope (initial)

  • Product, feature, release planning workflows entirely via Q&A (#628, #629, #630)
  • Interface for surfacing arbitrary Questions and Tasks, including the endless feed UX (#631) [detailed stories added]
  • Surfaces for Designs and Research approvals (#632)
  • Related: curiosity, contemplation, what-next, native TUI forms, run-qanda-session skill

Acceptance (to be refined via Q&A)

  • Full flows produce stubs + artifacts with minimal manual editing
  • Proactive, prioritized feed that feels native across surfaces
  • Clear escalation and approval paths
  • Detailed user stories/flows documented

Roadmap: #654
Vision pointer: #627
Status: Stub. Part of far-future v1.0.0.

Children assigned: #628, #629, #630, #631, #632

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start with the parent roadmap in #654 and the vision pointer in #627, then review child issues #628, #629, #630, #631, and #632. The scope is explicitly a stub and acceptance criteria are to be refined through Q&A. Done would require documented user stories and flows plus the agreed planning, feed, and approval experiences.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
cli, devtools
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.