akasper / akasper/plate

[Task]: Human review and direction for What Next? MCP Epic #282 (Design #284 + Epic close)

Open
#368 30 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Task
Dominant language
Python
Stars
1
Forks
0
Avg merge
8m
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Description

Human action required

Review progress and provide direction/approval to advance or close the What Next? MCP Epic (#282):

  • Research children #283 and #286 are closed with committed artifacts (what-next-mcp-*.md) and usage reports.
  • v1 static decision tree enhancements landed (more state from health/epics/release/curiosity/Goals/fragments, full babysit + base-sync, info-audit #218, Q&A during flows, role hints, cross-ceremony coverage; tests + guidance updated; dogfood in autonomous sessions).
  • Fragment committed for the enhancement.
  • Detailed "Design #284 input" + draft Epic summary comment + close plan posted in #282 comments (2026-06-07).
  • Open: Design #284 (need:refinement per planning), possible remaining Feature polish, then Epic-close ceremony (summary comment on #282 + PR from epic/what-next-mcp to release, human review per AGENTS before starting next Epic).

Why the agent cannot safely proceed

Per AGENTS.md (Human checkpoints, Epic-close ceremony, "stop and let the human review before starting the next epic", "Do not start a new epic autonomously without instruction"): the owner must review the research + design input + draft summary, confirm/iterate the schema/decision tree/ integration points for #284, then authorize the Epic-close. Autonomous agent has already extracted all possible research + v1 code + dogfood + artifacts without inventing owner vision or finalizing the Epic. Creating further Design changes or the close PR would bypass the required human checkpoint.

Context and affected artifacts

  • Epic #282 [Epic]: What Next? MCP (Beta Roadmap / milestone #1, area:agent, area:product, risk:medium, Epic: what-next-mcp label)
  • Related: #284 (Design), #285 (Feature v1, likely closed), #283/#286 (Research, closed), parent planning in #281 discussion, local docs/research/what-next-mcp-.md + .agentic/releases/unreleased/282-.json + mcp_server.py / agent_guidance.py / tests enhancements + AGENTS mentions.
  • Sibling work: Epic #349 / #358-#360 (Task type, which enabled this proper blocker notation), Epic #350 (Test Coverage, one child Research PR #367 just opened+auto-merged).
  • This Task itself created during scheduled autonomous loop execution (task 019e9ff27741) while making continuous progress on open issues.

Best-effort instructions

  1. Read the latest comments on #282 (esp. the long autonomous progress update with Design input + draft Epic summary + "ready for your review").
  2. Review the two research docs and the code changes for plate_what_next (static tree expansions).
  3. If the Design input is sufficient, either:
    • Confirm and let autonomous continue (e.g. "proceed with Design doc updates per the input" or "close #284").
    • Or open the Design PR yourself / provide refinements.
  4. When ready for Epic close: post (adapted) summary comment on #282 (include outcomes for children, evidence, migration, usage), then perform Epic-close PR per AGENTS §Epic-close ceremony.
  5. After merge, the next beta Epics (Test Coverage #350, Human Action Items #349, Release Ceremony #306, etc.) can be sequenced.

Done signal

  • Human posts the Epic summary comment on #282 (with optional but welcome) or explicitly comments on this Task "Done — direction provided / Epic close authorized. ".
  • Or the Epic-close PR for #282 is opened with reference to this Task.
  • If repo truth changed as side-effect of the human work, a follow-up Documentation/Feature PR is still expected.

Related links

  • #282 (primary)
  • #284, #358 (Task type definition), #349 (Human Action Items Epic)
  • docs/design/what-next-mcp-.md (no, the research in docs/research/what-next-mcp-.md)
  • .agentic/releases/unreleased/282-what-next-mcp-research-and-enhanced-v1-static.json
  • AGENTS.md §Epic-close, §Human checkpoints, §Autonomous Mode

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Read the latest comments on #282, especially the Design #284 input and draft Epic summary. Review docs/research/what-next-mcp-*.md, the unreleased JSON artifact, and the named mcp_server.py, agent_guidance.py, and test changes. Done means the human provides direction or authorizes closure, followed by the required Epic-close ceremony.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
python
Domain
ai-infra-agents, documentation
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Clearly specified
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.