[Bug]: Incorrect `residual_threshold` parameter in RANSAC Implementation
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 712
- Forks
- 96
- Avg merge
- 3d 1h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
## Expected Behavior
The RANSAC implementation should function correctly, with parameters synchronized with the `descriptive_id`. The algorithm should produce the expected number of output features based on the provided parameters.
## Current Behavior
The current RANSAC algorithm contains an error in the `residual_threshold` parameter. The parameter values do not match the actual values, which affects the number of output features.
### Example Error Messages:
1. **Error Message:**
```
MetricsObjective - Objective evaluation error for graph {'depth': 6, 'length': 7, 'nodes': [linear, sgdr, ridge, scaling, pca, ransac_non_lin_reg, ransac_non_lin_reg]} on metric rmse: Metric can not be evaluated because of: index 3 is out of bounds for axis 1 with size 3
```
2. **Error Message:**
```
MetricsObjective - Objective evaluation error for graph {'depth': 6, 'length': 6, 'nodes': [linear, fast_ica, pca, resample, catboostreg, ransac_non_lin_reg]} on metric rmse: Metric can not be evaluated because of: X has 19 features, but FastICA is expecting 17 features as input.
```
## Possible Solution
Revisit and test the RANSAC algorithm implementation, specifically focusing on the `residual_threshold` parameter on line 69 in `FEDOT/fedot/core/operations/evaluation/operation_implementations/data_operations/sklearn_filters.py`.
## Steps to Reproduce
n/a
## Context [OPTIONAL]
This bug was identified in PR #1334. The issue seems to stem from incorrect parameter handling in the RANSAC implementation, leading to discrepancies in the expected and actual feature counts.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.