aigc-apps / aigc-apps/VideoX-Fun
大神进来 视频转绘问题
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2.3k
- Forks
- 188
- Avg merge
- 2d 22h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
目前可以i2v, 或者t2v+pose, 但是好像不能用i2v+pose的方式??
比如:
i2v(也可以promt控制), 加上pose控制(或者controlnet),
我的目的就是为了实现和animatediff差不多的功能, 虽然andimatediff可以加一些放大或者controlent之类的生成, 但是animatediff生成的画面很多噪点还有画面不一致. 有大神指教一下吗??
测试了cogvideox-fun i2v+pose ,速度比animatediff lcm还要快. 效果也好很多....
Currently i2v, or t2v+pose can be used, but it seems that i2v+pose cannot be used.
For example:
i2v(also promt control), plus pose control (or controlnet),
My purpose is to achieve similar functions to animatediff, although andimatediff can add some magnification or controlent generation, but animatediff generated a lot of noise and screen inconsistency. Do you have some advice from the great God?
The cogvideox-fun i2v+pose was tested even faster than the animatediff lcm. It works a lot better....
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
The issue does not identify files, tests, or entry points. First inspect how VideoX-Fun currently handles i2v, t2v, pose, and ControlNet workflows; done would mean a documented or working i2v-plus-pose path comparable to the requested CogVideoX-Fun behavior.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- computer-vision, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100