aigc-apps / aigc-apps/VideoX-Fun
prompt_embeds = negative_prompt_embeds + prompt_embeds, why?
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 2.3k
- Forks
- 188
- Avg merge
- 2d 22h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
negative_prompt_embeds and prompt_embeds are concat to generate new prompt_embeds in StableDiffusionPipeline
but negative_prompt_embeds and prompt_embeds are just added to generate new prompt_embeds in WanFunPipeline
Is there any consideration or reference paper in this design?
hope for your reply
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Compare the StableDiffusionPipeline code at the linked diffusers location with WanFunPipeline at videox_fun/pipeline/pipeline_wan_fun.py:465. Trace how each pipeline combines negative_prompt_embeds and prompt_embeds, then check the issue discussion or referenced literature for the design rationale. Done means the behavior and any supporting reference are clearly documented or explained.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- ai, machine-learning
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100