A question about lifting messages
Open
documentation
pinned
- Dominant language
- Elm
- Stars
- 352
- Forks
- 41
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Just for my own edification: why have you used the idea of lifting messages (e.g.``` lift << Mdc```) instead of using ```Html.map``` and ```Cmd.map``` in the Elm file that contains the component?
In ```Material.elm``` you wrote:
> - `Material.Model` and `Material.Msg` have to know your top-level message type
> `Msg` for technical reasons.
Can you give me some insight into those technical reasons? I've followed your practice, and I'd just like to understand the pattern better.
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.