adoptium / adoptium/infrastructure

More than half of jdk_jdi tests failed with Dragonwell jdk on packet boxes

Open
#1,691 10 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub
bug
Dominant language
Python
Stars
96
Forks
106
Avg merge
1d 23h
Merged PRs (30d)
13

Description

More than half of jdk_jdi tests failed with Dragonwell jdk8 on packet boxes. Tests passed on other boxes. Also test build took 4 hours compared 40 mins on other boxes. Test builds with hotspot|openj9 on packet boxes also take three times longer than on other boxes without behaviour difference. That is test results are consistent running on packet or other boxes.

Screen Shot 2020-09-17 at 11 05 22 AM

https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/Test_openjdk/job/Test_openjdk8_dragonwell_sanity.openjdk_x86-64_linux/14/
https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/Test_openjdk/job/Test_openjdk8_dragonwell_sanity.openjdk_x86-64_linux/12/
https://ci.adoptopenjdk.net/view/Test_openjdk/job/Test_openjdk8_dragonwell_sanity.openjdk_x86-64_linux/10/

Not sure what's the difference between packet boxes with other except for performance?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

Research direction

Start by reviewing the linked Test_openjdk8_dragonwell_sanity.openjdk_x86-64_linux Jenkins runs and the jdk_jdi results, then compare them with hotspot and openj9 runs on packet and other boxes. Done means identifying the packet-box difference that causes the failures and threefold-or-worse runtime increase, with comparable test results and build duration restored.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
java
Domain
ci-cd, infrastructure, testing
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
30/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.