Phase 5: Glossary Content QA and Review

## Overview

Perform comprehensive content quality assurance and review with content strategists to ensure glossary accuracy and completeness.

**Related**: RFC Discussion #661 - Spectrum Design System Glossary

## Stakeholders

- **Content Strategists**: Jess Sattell, Kari Brookmyer
- **Platform Leads**: iOS, Android, Web Components, Qt teams
- **Token Team**: For token terminology validation

## Deliverables

### 1. Content Audit
- [ ] Create comprehensive inventory of all wiki sources
- [ ] Create migration spreadsheet tracking all terms
- [ ] Identify gaps in current coverage
- [ ] Check for missing terms in component schemas, token names, anatomy, platforms

### 2. Definition Review
- [ ] Review all 179+ registry terms with content strategists
- [ ] Verify definitions follow Naming Guide methodology
- [ ] Check superordinate accuracy
- [ ] Verify essential characteristics
- [ ] Validate terminology classification

### 3. Cross-Reference & Platform Validation
- [ ] Verify all related terms references
- [ ] Review platform terminology with platform teams
- [ ] Check platform code examples
- [ ] Validate platform documentation references

### 4. Quality & Accessibility
- [ ] Spell check, grammar review
- [ ] URL validation
- [ ] Web viewer accessibility testing (WCAG 2.1 AA)
- [ ] Performance testing

## Dependencies

- Phase 1: Content migration complete ✅
- Phase 3: Web viewer deployed

## Estimated Effort

1 week

## Related

- RFC: https://github.com/adobe/spectrum-design-data/discussions/661

Start with RFC Discussion #661, then inventory the wiki sources and migration spreadsheet described in the issue. Review the 179+ registry terms with the content strategists and platform teams; done means the listed audits, validations, accessibility checks, and performance testing are completed and tracked.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.