adobe-fonts / adobe-fonts/source-sans
IPA symbols with tilde overlay
- Vorherrschende Sprache
- CSS
- Sterne
- 3.7k
- Forks
- 243
- PR-Merge-Kennzahlen
- Keine gemergten PRs in 30 T.
Beschreibung
An overlaid tilde is used in the IPA to represent velarization or pharyngealization. In many varieties of English, this is the difference between the light [l] sound in leaf and the dark [ɫ] sound in feel. Given that its usage overlaps with that of the superscripts ˠ and ˤ, it is somewhat rare, but it’s still officially part of the IPA.
Unicode proposal [N2632](https://www.unicode.org/wg2/docs/n2632.pdf) from 2004 made the case that representing phonetic characters with middle tilde using U+0334 COMBINING TILDE OVERLAY is inappropriate, given that the number of symbols that could reasonably take a tilde overlay is relatively small, and that the variations in size, shape and position of the tilde for each base glyph cannot be easily automated. The 11 characters from this proposal were approved for Unicode 4.0: U+1D6C–U+1D76. One more was added in Unicode 13.0: U+AB68 LATIN SMALL LETTER TURNED R WITH MIDDLE TILDE. However, very few fonts support these precomposed characters, and sequences with U+0334 are far more common. For historical reasons, Unicode doesn’t treat these sequences as canonically identical, but in practice, for example, U+0073 U+0334 s̴ is essentially a stand-in for U+1D74 ᵴ.
Here are the glyphs I’m requesting, in both their composed and decomposed forms.
U+1D6C ᵬ
U+0062 U+0334 b̴
U+1D6D ᵭ
U+0064 U+0334 d̴
U+1D6E ᵮ
U+0066 U+0334 f̴
U+1D6F ᵯ
U+006D U+0334 m̴
U+1D70 ᵰ
U+006E U+0334 n̴
U+1D71 ᵱ
U+0070 U+0334 p̴
U+1D72 ᵲ
U+0072 U+0334 r̴
U+1D73 ᵳ
U+027E U+0334 ɾ̴
U+1D74 ᵴ
U+0073 U+0334 s̴
U+1D75 ᵵ
U+0074 U+0334 t̴
U+1D76 ᵶ
U+007A U+0334 z̴
U+AB68 ꭨ
U+0279 U+0334 ɹ̴
N/A
U+00F0 U+0334 ð̴
N2632 identifies four more base glyphs that could potentially take a tilde overlay (v ʔ k ð), but the author couldn’t find any evidence for them. I have found several instances of an eth with middle tilde published since then; they are encoded as U+00F0 U+0334. Since most fonts don’t have anchor points for overlaid diacritics, the glyphs shown are probably ad-hoc, but evidence from UCLA’s handwritten field notes suggests that the tilde should go through the ascender rather than the bowl of the eth.

Duwairi, Hussain al et al. “[Las consonantes en español y árabe: un análisis contrastivo para fines didácticos.](https://marcoele.com/descargas/18/duweiri-et-al_consonantes_arabes.pdf)” _marcoELE_. _Revista de Didáctica Español Lengua Extranjera_ (2014): 2.

Næss, Unn Gyda. [_“Gulf Pidgin Arabic”: Individual strategies or a structured variety? A study of some features of the linguistic behaviour of Asian migrants in the Gulf countries_](https://www.duo.uio.no/bitstream/handle/10852/24267/Naess_Master.pdf). 2008. University of Oslo. Master’s thesis.

“[Arabic, Tunisian Spoken.](http://archive.phonetics.ucla.edu/Language/AEB/aeb.html)” _The UCLA Phonetics Lab Archive_. 2007. Los Angeles, CA: UCLA Department of Linguistics.
Beitragsleitfaden
Für dieses Repository ist kein Beitragsleitfaden indexiert
Bewertung
Dieses Issue wurde noch nicht bewertet.