active-hash / active-hash/active_hash
Support associations
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
v2.0.0
- Dominant language
- Ruby
- Stars
- 1.4k
- Forks
- 186
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
@flavorjones @zilkey
It would be nice to move on to newer standards:
Add:
-
where(:name => ["super", "secret"]).order(:name) -
where(:other => {:name => "user"}).order(:id).first
Deprecate:
-
find_by_name_and_country -
find(:all, :conditions => {:name => "super"}) - drop rails 2.x
- drop ruby 1.8.7 (and 1.9.3)?
What do you think about deprecating these older standards?
I'm up for the work.
Just want your take on whether this is a good direction.
--Keenan
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by locating the repository's existing association and query APIs, then compare them with the proposed where/order examples and the Rails 2.x and Ruby compatibility items. Done would require an agreed scope, implemented support, and a documented deprecation plan.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- rails, ruby
- Domain
- databases
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 20/100