actions / actions/starter-workflows

I think we should keep `null` as `no message set` as before.

Open
#3,087 1 comment 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
TypeScript
Stars
12.1k
Forks
7.3k
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

I think we should keep null as no message set as before.

  if (message == null) {

Originally posted by @BridgeAR in https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/58532#discussion_r2118436011

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

The body is a suggestion copied from a Node.js pull-request discussion and names no starter-workflows file, test, or entry point. First confirm whether this repository is expected to change; done would require a stated target and validation, which the issue currently does not provide.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
typescript
Domain
ci-cd
Issue type
Bug
Difficulty
4/5
Estimated time
3-5 days
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
15/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.