feedback(commands): create-lang-conversion-skill from typescript-rust
- Dominant language
- Jupyter Notebook
- Stars
- 8
- Forks
- 3
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
## Feedback: create-lang-conversion-skill
### Context
- **Task**: Creating `convert-typescript-rust` skill
- **Command**: `/create-lang-conversion-skill typescript rust`
- **Used for**: Workflow guidance, template structure, validation checklist
### What Worked Well
- **Step-by-step workflow** was clear and comprehensive
- **Template structure** in Step 5 provided excellent skeleton
- **Content requirements table** (Section → Minimum → Quality Bar) was very helpful
- **Validation checklist** in Step 7 ensured nothing was missed
- **Example complexity guide** helped calibrate the right level of detail
- **Cross-reference validation** ensured proper skill linkage
- **Step 10 feedback loop** is excellent for continuous improvement
### Suggested Improvements
- [ ] **Add timing estimates** for each step (e.g., "Step 2: Read Foundation - 10-15 min")
- [ ] **Include example output** for "Quick Reference" table (what constitutes "10 entries"?)
- [ ] **Add guidance on when to use WebSearch** vs relying on existing skills
- [ ] **Clarify idiom translation depth** - how much explanation is "why" enough?
- [ ] **Add suggestion for organizing large type mapping tables** (should primitives be alphabetical or grouped by similarity?)
- [ ] **Include pattern for handling language-specific features** with no equivalent
- [ ] **Add guidance on balancing comprehensiveness vs maintainability** (when is a skill "too comprehensive"?)
### Additional Notes
The command workflow is excellent. It successfully guided creation of a comprehensive, production-ready skill. The suggested improvements are minor enhancements that would help calibrate effort and scope even better.
The feedback loop (Step 10) is brilliant - it creates a continuous improvement cycle for the skill creation process itself.
---
Feedback from: `/create-lang-conversion-skill typescript rust`
Contributor guide
Assessment
This issue has not been assessed yet.