WordPress / WordPress/php-toolkit
Blueprints: Research how people use them
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- PHP
- Stars
- 61
- Forks
- 21
- Avg merge
- 19h 34m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Description
Do we think recipes are being used in the wild yet? Do we have examples of that to look at?
Plugin authors are starting to use Blueprints in the plugin directory, which provides some great examples. What other examples are out there? Understanding their perceived strengths and shortcomings would be greatly useful for building Blueprint builders and other experiences. Do people resort to piping PHP often? Do they mostly use it for including additional plugins? etc.
Here's a few examples I could think of, feel free to edit this issue and update the list:
- https://joost.blog/plugin-demos-with-the-wordpress-playground/
- https://repl.wpgraphql.com/?wp=6.4&php=8.2&playground_url=%2Fwp-admin%2Fadmin.php%3Fpage%3Dgraphiql-ide&name=Hello+World
- https://translate.wordpress.org/projects/wp-plugins/friends/dev/de/default/playground/
cc @tellyworth @StevenDufresne @jdevalk @akirk
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the three linked Blueprint examples and the plugin-directory examples mentioned in the issue. Document how people use Blueprints, including perceived strengths, shortcomings, piping PHP, and inclusion of additional plugins. Done means the issue contains a useful collection of examples and usage patterns.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- php, wordpress
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 4/5
- Estimated time
- 3-5 days
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100