CacheStorage / localStorage or something similar needs to be included?

Open
#9 9 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Assessment

Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Newbie friendliness
25/100
Issue type
Feature
Clarity
Needs clarification
Activity status
Stale
Domain
api, web-dev

Research direction

Read the linked Service Workers Cache objects and HTML Web Storage specifications, then compare those APIs with the proposal's current scope. Determine whether CacheStorage or localStorage belongs in the local KV feature and document the resulting API boundary; no repository files or tests are named.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Description

I think those APIs should be included for supporting local KV features.

Dominant language
Bikeshed
Stars
308
Forks
17
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

More from WinterTC55/proposal-minimum-common-api

All issues in WinterTC55/proposal-minimum-common-api

Similar issues

More Backend & API Design issues

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.