WebAssembly / WebAssembly/custom-descriptors
Enumerability of methods, getters, and setters
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- WebAssembly
- Stars
- 12
- Forks
- 3
- Avg merge
- 3d 2h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
Normal methods, getters, and setters on JS classes are not enumerable, but it might be important for getters and setters to be enumerable to emulate normal own-properties. We could easily support this by using a bit in the method-kind specifier to say whether the property should be enumerable or not.
Does this sound useful?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. Start by reviewing the custom method-kind specifier and the existing enumerability behavior for normal methods, getters, and setters; done would require a decided design for representing and exposing getter/setter enumerability.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- javascript, wasm
- Domain
- web-dev
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100