WebAssembly / WebAssembly/WASI
Idea: Content-Addressed Interface Verification for WASI (Hybrid Named/Anonymous Model)
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Rust
- Stars
- 5.8k
- Forks
- 333
- Avg merge
- 2d 13h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 3
Description
Hi WASI community,
I'm sharing a research-level proposal exploring content-addressed verification as an opt-in extension to the current WASI interface model.
Disclaimer: This is a conceptual exploration. I do not have resources to implement, maintain, or champion this proposal. However, I still think that the idea is interesting enough and worth sharing.
🔍 Core Idea
- Problem: Current WASI relies on named interfaces + central registries, causing naming fatigue, version drift, offline deployment friction, and complex dependency graphs.
- Propsed Solution: Opt-in content-addressed verification using structural hashes alongside existing names. Introduces
@anonymousinterfaces for ephemeral/CLI contracts and a configurablewit-sources.tomlfetch model (git/maven/file/nexus) for offline/enterprise use. - Key Mechanism:
@version(hash=...)+@available(version=...)enable deterministic runtime projection and instant drift detection. Hash mismatches flag forks/vendor modifications before deployment. - Scope: Looks like backwards compatible. Canonicalization v1 intentionally limited to avoid ABI risks. Missing
@available= member exists in all versions. Hashes verify integrity, not authenticity. - Open Questions: Formal canonicalization rules for complex types? Transitive dependency resolution strategy? Feasibility as a
wasm-toolsextension? Community interest level?
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the linked interface-publishing-improvement.md proposal and the current WASI interface model; the issue does not identify repository files or tests. Assess the open questions around canonicalization, transitive dependencies, and wasm-tools feasibility, then document whether the opt-in model has a defined path forward.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- wasm
- Domain
- operating-systems
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100