WICG / WICG/cpu-performance

Permissions Policy integration

Open
#9 0 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
HTML
Stars
37
Forks
7
PR merge metrics
No merged PRs in 30d

Description

CPU Performance API by design provides a non-trivial risk of fingerprinting. Is there a plan to add a Permissions/Feature Policy integration?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No files, tests, or implementation entry points are identified in the issue. Start by reviewing the CPU Performance API proposal and the relevant Permissions/Feature Policy requirements, then clarify the integration scope and acceptance criteria with maintainers; done would be an agreed plan or a concrete follow-up issue.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Tech stack
html
Domain
api, security, web-dev
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.