WICG / WICG/container-timing

Convert "ignore" into a nesting mode, and add variants.

Open
#22 12 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Bikeshed
Stars
72
Forks
10
Avg merge
9d 15h
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Description

Right now we have containertiming-ignore and containertiming-nesting strategy. I think you could just merge these together as a single "nesting strategy" but help disambiguate "ignore" mode.

I think there are two forms of "ignore":

  1. "Not interested in any timings, for self or ancestors" (performance optimization?)
  2. "This is a container root, and I don't want to report paints up" ("isolated" component or something?)

Consider using names such as: disabled and private to differentiate (bikeshed!).

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

Start by comparing the existing containertiming-ignore and containertiming-nesting strategies with the two proposed ignore meanings. The issue needs a maintainer-approved distinction and names such as disabled and private before implementation can be scoped; done means the nesting strategy variants and their semantics are agreed and documented.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
performance, web-dev
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Quiet
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
25/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.