WICG / WICG/container-timing

When previous records of container timing should be invalidated?

Open
#19 3 comments 0 reactions 0 assignees View on GitHub

Nobody has claimed this yet.

Dominant language
Bikeshed
Stars
72
Forks
10
Avg merge
9d 15h
Merged PRs (30d)
3

Description

There are several scenarios where changes in the containertiming attributes changes may have effect on the events generated for container timing:

  • When containertiming is removed from a node.
  • When the containertiming identifier changes.
  • When the nesting policy changes for a node.

What should we do in each case for the events that may have been collected before the attribute change?

Contributor guide

Open the contributing guide

First steps

  1. Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
  2. Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
  3. Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
  4. Open a pull request that references the issue number.

Research direction

No file or test is named. Start by reviewing the three listed attribute-change scenarios and the existing Container Timing event behavior, then determine the intended invalidation rules for previously collected events; done means each scenario has an agreed, documented outcome.

Written by the indexing model from the issue text.

Assessment

Domain
api, web-dev
Issue type
Feature
Difficulty
5/5
Estimated time
Over a week
Activity status
Stale
Clarity
Needs clarification
Newbie friendliness
20/100

Get new issues in your inbox

A short digest of beginner-friendly GitHub issues.