VeryGoodOpenSource / VeryGoodOpenSource/vgv-ai-flutter-plugin
feat: automated weekly skill check against Claude Code changelog
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Shell
- Stars
- 162
- Forks
- 23
- Avg merge
- 2d 22h
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 4
Description
Description
Add a bot-driven workflow that automatically checks this plugin's skills against the latest Claude Code changelog on a weekly cadence. When Claude Code ships changes that affect skill behavior (tool APIs, hook contracts, slash-command semantics, frontmatter conventions, MCP server contracts), the bot should surface which skills may be impacted so they can be reviewed and updated before they silently break.
Requirements
- Scheduled weekly job (e.g. GitHub Actions cron) that fetches the latest Claude Code changelog/release notes.
- Diff the changelog against the last-checked version and extract entries relevant to skills, agents, and MCP servers.
- Map changed surfaces to potentially affected skills (e.g.
bloc,testing,navigation,layered-architecture,create-project). - Output a report — open or update a tracking issue listing impacted skills and the relevant changelog entries.
- No false-quiet: if parsing fails or the changelog format changes, the job flags it rather than passing silently.
Additional Context
Pairs with the evaluation tables/data work so impacted skills can be re-tested against updates automatically. See #104.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start at the GitHub Actions workflow entry point and review how the repository organizes skills such as bloc, testing, navigation, layered-architecture, and create-project. Trace the Claude Code changelog/release notes input and the relationship to the evaluation tables/data work in #104. Done means a weekly report identifies affected skills, tracks the last checked version, and flags parsing failures instead of passing silently.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- github-actions, shell
- Domain
- ci-cd, tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 42/100