Ability to hide VFT member of class when calling member functions

I appreciate the current implementation, which displays the VFT member itself when accessing member functions of the class, as demonstrated in the example below:

However, I prefer this behavior only if I haven't fully understood the class that I'm reversing. When I feel confident in my understanding of the class, I prefer not to see calls to member functions through the VFT member (e.g. cat_vtable). Instead, I would like to see member function calls directly on the class itself. For example, instead of cat->cat_vtable->introduce(cat), I want to see cat->introduce(cat). This provides a clearer and more concise representation of the code so saving space.

Perhaps we could inform BN to hide the VFT member with an option, or we could adopt a similar approach to IDA. If I remember correctly, IDA hides it when we name the VFT pointer and VFT name according to certain rules. Personally, I would prefer this approach.

Start by reviewing how Binary Ninja renders member-function calls through a VFT member, using the cat_vtable example in the issue as the expected comparison. Investigate whether the behavior should be controlled by an option or by naming rules like IDA; done means confidently identified behavior and an agreed implementation scope for hiding the VFT member.