[METHOD AUDIT]: Missing fields in 5-CFDA assay to determine cytotoxicity (#170)
Open
Nobody has claimed this yet.
method-audit
- Dominant language
- R
- Stars
- 0
- Forks
- 8
- Avg merge
- 44m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 1
Description
The method JSON generated from #170 is missing the following fields:
- Available SOP or protocol
- Ontology term
- Type (ontology IRI)
- Relevant VHP4Safety regulatory question(s)
- Citation
Please update the original issue or the JSON file directly.
/cc @jmillanacosta @JuliaMeer
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing the original issue #170 and the method JSON it generated. Check how the other method entries represent protocol, ontology, regulatory-question, and citation metadata, then fill the five listed fields for the 5-CFDA assay. Done means the original issue or JSON contains all five fields in the project’s expected format.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- json
- Domain
- documentation
- Issue type
- Documentation
- Difficulty
- 2/5
- Estimated time
- 1-3 hours
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Mostly clear
- Newbie friendliness
- 55/100