feat(admin): forms & surveys
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- HTML
- Stars
- 33
- Forks
- 104
- Avg merge
- 12h 3m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 10
Description
Summary
Form builder for membership renewals, event RSVPs, working-group sign-ups, and ad-hoc community surveys. New ground — no schema today.
Requirements
- Brainstorming → spec under
docs/superpowers/specs/. Schema design is part of the spec. - Decide form-builder approach during brainstorm: build in-house (custom JSON schema + renderer), use a hosted service (Tally / Typeform / Formspree), or a hybrid (host the schema + render in our SPA, store responses in our DB).
-
/admin/forms— list, create, archive forms. -
/admin/forms/:id/responses— view / export responses, basic analytics. - Public render path: forms can be embedded into
apps/webpages or stand alone at/forms/:slug. - Response routing: trigger downstream actions (e.g., RSVP form populates
event_attendances, renewal form updatesorg_memberships).
Context
Foundation must ship first (#1956). Form builder is conceptually orthogonal to most other admin surfaces — could ship anytime after foundation, ordering depends on operational urgency.
Implementation Notes
- Privacy: forms collect personal data; design the consent capture and retention model deliberately.
- This subsystem may justify its own R2 bucket for file uploads on form responses.
- "Hybrid hosted-service" path (e.g., Tally) is the YAGNI default until form needs outpace what an embed can do.
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start with the foundation work in #1956, then read the existing admin routes and apps/web entry points. Create the required spec under docs/superpowers/specs/, including the schema, implementation approach, privacy model, and response routing. Done means the team has approved the approach and the listed admin, public, response, and export flows are implemented.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- full-stack
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Quiet
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100