Should we use the all-contributors bot on this site?

Some OSS communities I'm part of use all-contributors to recognize contributions, esp those that are not necessarily code -- like website content 🙂

What do we think about doing that?

It just occurred to me while doing a review on a PR and pinging someone else to ask them if they want to review as well.
At pyOpenSci for example, we review content and then all the reviewers are added as contributors.
See for example this review of one of the sections in one of our guides:
https://github.com/pyOpenSci/python-package-guide/pull/106#issuecomment-1847793410

I could imagine a similar review process for us: e.g. when @rinkug et al release the guide they've been putting so much work into, then a wider part of the community could review a PR adding it to this site. This not only gives everyone credit but also would help show visitors to our site the breadth of our community

It would require (1) giving the bot permissions and then (2) educating site maintainers about how the bot works.
See https://allcontributors.org/docs/en/bot/overview

Start by reviewing the all-contributors bot overview linked in the issue and the example pyOpenSci pull request. Determine whether this site wants the bot, what permissions it would require, and how maintainers would be taught to use it; done means a documented decision and implementation plan.