[FEAT-Design/Planning]: Assess user story - Hot-starting failed runs
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- No language data
- Stars
- 2
- Forks
- 0
- PR merge metrics
- No merged PRs in 30d
Description
Title: Hot-starting failed runs
User Story:
As a modeler, I want continue failed simulations so that I don’t have to replicate already simulated outputs.
Notes:
The models operate on a statistical concept called Monte-Carlo simulation. The idea is that the overall simulation is consist of subsimulations (called iterations or life-cycles). Each iteration has elements sampled from stochastic distributions.
The models are not perfect, it is often the case that a specific iteration would trigger a model error and the overall simulation fails. If there are previously finished valid iterations, we want to continue on from where the last iteration finished rather than starting the computation from scratch.
I think this would fall into the category of optimization. So if the cost of restarting (in term of time and computing cost) is not very high, then this user story should not be as highly prioritized.
Contributor guide
No contributing guide indexed for this repository
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
No files, tests, or entry points are named. First clarify how completed iterations are stored and identified, what should happen after an iteration fails, and how a resumed simulation is recognized as complete; done should be a decided, implementable scope for continuing valid prior iterations.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Domain
- performance
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100