UMass-Rescue / UMass-Rescue/RescueBox
RescueBox: publish performance results as a pdf , from scripts
Nobody has claimed this yet.
- Dominant language
- Python
- Stars
- 6
- Forks
- 15
- Avg merge
- 14h 42m
- Merged PRs (30d)
- 7
Description
publish performance results as a pdf , from scripts/results
src/face-detection-recognition/benchmark_testing
and
src/face-detection-recognition/best_results
can we come up with a standard look and feel from a customer view to see the different models and tradeoffs
can Prasanna help with repo information for other plugins students in the past worked on ?
how about an automated test runner for such outputs that any plugin can use ?
Nick suggested > A performance metric system to compare different plugins against each other to see which ones perform the best
Contributor guide
First steps
- Read the whole issue, then the project's contributing guide.
- Comment on the issue to say you are picking it up — it saves two people doing the same work.
- Fork the repository and make your change on a branch.
- Open a pull request that references the issue number.
Research direction
Start by reviewing scripts/results, src/face-detection-recognition/benchmark_testing, and src/face-detection-recognition/best_results. Compare the age_gender_classifier evaluation path and facematch plugin linked in the issue. The scope is complete when a standard customer-facing PDF format and a reusable way to compare plugin performance are defined, with an automated test runner if that remains in scope.
Written by the indexing model from the issue text.
Assessment
- Tech stack
- python
- Domain
- data-visualization, tooling
- Issue type
- Feature
- Difficulty
- 5/5
- Estimated time
- Over a week
- Activity status
- Stale
- Clarity
- Needs clarification
- Newbie friendliness
- 25/100